The law is agnostic about truth.

Foolish liberals who are trying to read the Second Amendment out of the constitution by claiming it's not an individual right or that it's too much of a safety hazard don't see the danger of the big picture. They're courting disaster by encouraging others to use this same means to eliminate portions of the Constitution they don't like.

We, the People of this country, have no unalienable rights... all our rights are subject to modification... the Constitution of the United States of America is nothing more than a piece of paper and... our government should not be restrained by the Constitution because our government can do good things for people.

A good lawyer knows how to shut up when he's won his case.

Most liberal democracies don't try to figure out what the truth is.

Laws are important precisely because in a democracy they reflect the attitudes and aspirations of those they govern.

Every celebrity case I've been involved in -- I've been involved in a great many -- the one thing you can be sure of is they don't get the same justice as everybody else. It could be worse, it could be better, it's never the same.

I was a Jewish rabbinical student for 12 years, and studied the Bible all the time.

There's no evidence that I'm aware of that guns protect liberty.

Judges are the weakest link in our system of justice, and they are also the most protected.

There's no evidence that I'm aware of that guns reduce crime.

I have always considered Pascal's Wager a questionable bet to place. Any God worth believing in would surely prefer an honest agnostic to a calculating hypocrite.

I read in the newspaper that the Catholic Church finally decided that it had been theologically improper to try to convert the Jews. Whoops! Sorry for all those inquisitions, crusades, and autos-da-fe. Previous popes were wrong -- infallible, perhaps, but wrong.

I am deeply concerned that, without peace and a two-state solution, the Jewish and democratic nature of Israel is in danger. That's why I have opposed Israel's settlement policy since 1973, and that's why I have favored a two-state solution since 1967.

Everybody says they're opposed to torture. But everyone would do it personally if they knew it could save the life of a kidnapped child who had only two hours of oxygen left before death. And it would be the right thing to do.

Doing something because God has said to do it does not make a person moral: it merely tells us that person is a prudential believer, akin to the person who obeys the command of an all-powerful secular king.

When I was 14 or 15, a camp counselor told me I was smart. I had never been very good in school, but he told me once that I was smart but my mind operated a little differently.

A criminal trial is never about seeking justice for the victim. If it were, there could be only one verdict: guilty.

If America has the right to target Osama bin Laden, or terrorists, of course Israel has the right to defend itself from terrorism.

The defendant wants to hide the truth because he's generally guilty. The defense attorney's job is to make sure the jury does not arrive at that truth.