The fact is, we are a nine-member court that sits on cases.

If I stumbled badly in doing the job, I think it would have made life more difficult for women, and that was a great concern of mine and still is.

Suppose you had a cross burning in a play or a movie... Would that be intimidating?

I wanted to be a cattle rancher when I was young, because it was what I knew and I loved it.

What the framers of the Constitution tried to achieve when they wrote that Constitution back in the 1700s was an independent federal judiciary. They wanted federal judges to be appointed by the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate, and to serve for good behavior.

If you take a position under the Constitution that is against the majority view, you have to explain it well enough that maybe you can persuade some of that majority to agree with you.

Yes, I will bring the understanding of a woman to the Court, but I doubt that alone will affect my decisions.

The destiny of the woman must be shaped to a large extent on her own conception of her spiritual imperative and her place in society.

It was better for me when I was joined at the court by a second woman. When I was there alone, there was too much media focus on the one woman, and the minute we got another woman, that changed.

The whole idea of a public education was to train young people about how our system of government works, so they could be good citizens and be part of it. We're not doing that today.

Society as a whole benefits immeasurably from a climate in which all persons, regardless of race or gender, may have the opportunity to earn respect, responsibility, advancement and remuneration based on ability.

We pay a price when we deprive children of the exposure to the values, principles, and education they need to make them good citizens.

We do not count heads before enforcing the First Amendment.

This chance will stand before you only once.

The power I exert on the court depends on the power of my arguments, not on my gender.

What was a problem was the excessive amount of media attention to the appointment of the first woman and everything she did. Everywhere that Sandra went, the press was sure to go. And that got tiresome; it was stressful.

We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.

Unfortunately civility is hard to codify or legislate, but you know it when you see it. It's possible to disagree without being disagreeable.

It's hard to have little children and a job and career at the same time. There is no time left for you as a woman.

Each justice hires their own clerks, and applications are made individually to the justices. It isn't a group decision.